Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SG RED DEVIL

Chengdu Marathon announced as Abbott World Marathon Majors candidate race

Recommended Posts

Hmmmm..........

1. What is the difference between this and Singapore Ironman claiming that they want to get SCSM as a marathon major? is it this one already action and currently in the process of being evaluated by the committee, but Singapore one just NATO? 

2. I know age is not a critical factor, but given that the marathon has only been held 2 times, would it undermine the "brand"" of others majors who have a much longer history? 

3. Anyone ran this last year or the year before?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/15/2019 at 11:23 AM, beast said:

Hmmmm..........

1. What is the difference between this and Singapore Ironman claiming that they want to get SCSM as a marathon major? is it this one already action and currently in the process of being evaluated by the committee, but Singapore one just NATO? 

2. I know age is not a critical factor, but given that the marathon has only been held 2 times, would it undermine the "brand"" of others majors who have a much longer history? 

3. Anyone ran this last year or the year before?

Found some interesting answers to your query.

My initial thought was Ironman is bidding to join as part of major series (SCSM has been a candidate since 2017). Whereas Chengdu selection  was more on commercial interest. 

To answer both query 1 & 2, global runners CSI. Why was Chengdu 2 year old marathon chosen? Reason is that Wanda Chairman' Wang Jianlin's hometown . Best part is Ironman is owed by Wanda too as mentioned by global runners. 

Reply from Abbott as per below.

image.png.4552572c3686603ea096a43ec4bab773.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm very interesting find that is linked back to Ironman.....

I think the Abbott World Marathon Series should leave the 6 world majors alone and create a new world majors series. The original world majors have a rich and deep history, and adding new ones with younger history will break the branding/image of this series. But I am guessing the committee doesn't really care about that, not when the request to be added is put forth by a group with large financial backing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/21/2019 at 10:24 AM, beast said:

Hmmm very interesting find that is linked back to Ironman.....

I think the Abbott World Marathon Series should leave the 6 world majors alone and create a new world majors series. The original world majors have a rich and deep history, and adding new ones with younger history will break the branding/image of this series. But I am guessing the committee doesn't really care about that, not when the request to be added is put forth by a group with large financial backing.

 

I fully agree with you on this to leave the 6 majors alone.

Like you mentioned another 6 comprises Singapore, China, Australia, Africa, Greece (Birth of Marathon) & South America?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 6 major series itself isn't that old right? Less than 10 years? In my opinion if the standards really met, why not? It is up to them to control the branding.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/22/2019 at 1:22 PM, SG RED DEVIL said:

I fully agree with you on this to leave the 6 majors alone.

Like you mentioned another 6 comprises Singapore, China, Australia, Africa, Greece (Birth of Marathon) & South America?

Yes need to leave the 6 majors first

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/23/2019 at 11:57 AM, Arvin Tunas said:

The 6 major series itself isn't that old right? Less than 10 years? In my opinion if the standards really met, why not? It is up to them to control the branding.  

You are right. The World Marathon Series is created so that there is a championship element for World's most elite runners to partake in.  Makes it easier for gather these runners under these selected races so that competition between them can be more standardized and controlled, instead of different elite runners achieving results under varying conditions. 

It has nothing to do with the prestige of marathons in general, or the history of the chosen marathons etc. They are chosen most likely because of their well organization,  conditions that are accepted by many of the runners, and very likely some backstage politics as well.

As long as the committee is happy and they are able to control the branding, they can add as many of the marathons as they want. The elite runners can also have more runs they can choose from, and maybe focus on the ones they think they can do better in. For the casual runners that are chasing after the prestige of running in one of them, they can also have more choices now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Upcoming Events

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OhMyGod, 50 pushups, well done 👍   Saw Lexus Tan facebook, he own self say know qi gong, can apply.    I scare scare, should I call? 
    • Slightly OT, but from the Straits Times article quoted by Lady Ice: A time of 2:46:57 is fast of course. Impossibly fast for a slow runner like me, but whenever I look at race results from marathons elsewhere in the world, and compare it to the times of our best runners of countries in Southeast Asia, even if one were to exclude the times of African runners from the equation, our runners here in SE Asia appear to be outclassed. I've always wondered why??? 🤔 Even in Japanese marathons, the Japanese winner's times are usually at 2:30++ on average. Are we at some disadvantage because we live in a hot climate, compared to those in temperate countries? When I mentioned to a runner from Victoria (AUS) that I usually run in temps of 27-33C, his jaw dropped...
    • SCSM T shirts are also usually sold at the pre-race expo, not just in SCSM but also other IAAF certified marathons in other parts of the world. The actual finisher shirt handed to you at the finish line is of course different though. I have nothing against those who want to buy a souvenir or presents for family and friends back home, but I strongly believe finisher shirts should be earned. Medals are usually just made of cheap metal or plastic, but to a runner, that "token" represents all the blood sweat and tears  you put into finishing the race. I don't remember where I read this, but there was this story about a guy whose wife completed her first marathon in Chicago. He told his friend: "I just bought her an expensive designer bag. That finisher certificate she got from completing the marathon probably cost the organizers a few cents to print. If she had to choose between the two of which to keep though, I know it would be that finisher's certificate & medal on our wall!" 🥴
    • I’m not a local, so I didn’t know the story about that pastry chef, but the link to the Straits Times article was an amusing read. It said he picked up running in 2011, and only runs 1 km at each time (!?!?!?) on weekends, yet he managed to cover  19kms in an actual race before giving up. I suspect though he probably walked most of that. If he could cover that distance running without training though, he must be either gifted, or very fit from another sport or life activity. Imagine what he would actually be capable of if he just took the time to train properly!
    • Oh, don't know how they got hold of them. But during last year's OCBC Cycle, I saw the organizer selling past years' shirts at the race pack collection venue. I think this is good recycling practice as there should be excess and will be a pity just to scrap them. As well sell cheap to cyclists who may want to buy them.
×
×
  • Create New...