Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

trailblazer

New Release of Garmin GPS Running Watch: Forerunner 220 & 620

Recommended Posts

Anyone 620 users having accuracy issues?

I have done 2 runs so far on firmware 2.8 (GPS 3.1): 10km (actual distance ~10.7km) and 2.27km (actual 2.4km), course is 730m lap on mapometer (http://sg.mapometer.com/running/route_2573418.html), tree cover is like any normal neighbourhood.

From above, the error margin is ~7% and 5.42%... which is quite substantial in my opinion. Is this the norm for most GPS watches considering the tree cover?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have the GPS track to compare?

You can try to submit report to garmin either e-mailing (forgot the exact email) or go on forum to post.

https://forums.garmin.com/forum.php

One of the hotter FR620 threads

https://forums.garmin.com/showthread.php?65707-GPS-inaccuracies/page28

GPS tracks here:

http://connect.garmin.com/activity/528253631

http://connect.garmin.com/activity/530918044

I'll post in that topic then, seems to be quite a common issue for this model.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

assuming you are lapping the same route.. dear god... those are ugly...

Had same issue with my Fenix2.. qq..

Although I think software wise the fenix and FR team are different working groups.

Ya.. I noticed the gps tracking become really bad near thick foliage/ tall buildings...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with lazyitachi. Your 620 really didn't plot the route you took well.

For my 220,I don't really have such issue but in the worst case situation it fails, I may want to use it with a calibrated footpod (back up move).

Puzzling to see a high end 620 will have off tangent route plotting issue. Hmm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I relook at the track and I switch to satellite mode to see actual terrain.

All I see is tall building... tall building.. tall buildings....

I can only tell you from running in CBD... somehow the gps is REALLY skewed by tall buildings...

I walk even 50 m near.. the track go haywire.. HAIZ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So... apparently it's the highrise + tree cover and also 620 doesn't do well with lapping. I'm aware of the limitations of GPS watches but a 620 giving this margin of error is quite unacceptable given that it's quite high-end.

http://fellrnr.com/wiki/Best_Running_Watch

http://fellrnr.com/wiki/GPS_Accuracy

This guy plots data from a lot of watches and it seems that using a calibrated footpod is the best option. And apparently the GPS in the iPhone 4s is really really good :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So... apparently it's the highrise + tree cover and also 620 doesn't do well with lapping. I'm aware of the limitations of GPS watches but a 620 giving this margin of error is quite unacceptable given that it's quite high-end.

http://fellrnr.com/wiki/Best_Running_Watch

http://fellrnr.com/wiki/GPS_Accuracy

This guy plots data from a lot of watches and it seems that using a calibrated footpod is the best option. And apparently the GPS in the iPhone 4s is really really good :P

wow. quite informative, thanks for sharing. And I am also using a 620. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So... apparently it's the highrise + tree cover and also 620 doesn't do well with lapping. I'm aware of the limitations of GPS watches but a 620 giving this margin of error is quite unacceptable given that it's quite high-end.

http://fellrnr.com/wiki/Best_Running_Watch

http://fellrnr.com/wiki/GPS_Accuracy

This guy plots data from a lot of watches and it seems that using a calibrated footpod is the best option. And apparently the GPS in the iPhone 4s is really really good :P

wow. quite informative, thanks for sharing. And I am also using a 620. :(

No problem.

Anyway I have done some research on foot pods too. The main advantage is once you calibrate them, they are more accurate than GPS for distance, pace and cadence. The main catch is with change in speed/pace, change in shoes, change in location placed on shoes, the calibration will be off (which is quite a pain in the ass IMO). So for me, the only real reason to use foot pods is for treadmill running because when running outdoors, I will probably be changing shoes and changing pace pretty often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going for IPPT soon and would like to know if the timing works fine without GPS and function like a stopwatch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going for IPPT soon and would like to know if the timing works fine without GPS and function like a stopwatch?

Yes,you can use the your Garmin Forerunner 220/620 without the GPS. It can only track time if you do so but even having said that,I will switch on the GPS function if my IPPT run has a stadium track.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the 620 have an internal accelerometer?

Cos Fenix 2 has one and it uses your recorded stride length to guesstimate your pace (based on your cadence) and okok accuracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes..... in fact both 220 and 620 have an on-board accelerometer that is pre-calibrated so even with no gps signals, we would still be able to track our cadence.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you guys tried the HRM with other running apps on your iPhone or Android? Cos I'm testing with my friend and he's interested to purchase the Garmin HRM to pair with his iPhone/Android and use it with Adidas MiCoach App. I have tried to pair with my Samsung S5 but it doesn't detect the HRM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know where to buy the HRM-run and how much it cost? Mine start to split...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought mine online.... its unboxed from ebay...

but it works for me..... fingers crossed nth happen within the year...

else... have to think of ways to game the system...

The local distros i think is quite expensive IIRC .. 150 SGD?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Upcoming Events

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The best thing about virtual SCSM will prove that people can byo  Reduce waste generation 😀 and of course my avatar would have to have a tyre 🤓
    • a look at how USA Run Races - Recommended Guidelines for Small to Large Running Events...                    
    • Reflection on SCSM Virtual Club platform, simply allow sync-ing of all the major trackers seamlessly... otherwise, if not..then   what uncle did for past weeks...with Runkeeper...and latest Adidas Running..linked to Sport Heroes Technology (Ironman)....   uncle's digital sports experiences are updated at dashboard of SCSM platform >>>>> https://app.sgmarathonvc.com/en/dashboard hours ago, trying out with adidas running runtastic... works fine...👍 uncle is happy...register FREE, gets REWARDED with earned BADGES, in Both VR RACE and CHALLENGES...come in 1-session only, multiple-sessions with option of  Distance-only or Time-only   like this one register (Time-only) .....uncle gonna to do this one next week (Week 6)... 3-consecutive-day with 30-min run challenge...Streaker...     and as uncle as previously said, "Challenge can be repeated max of 3 times"... Streaker - back-to-back runs 90mins...to uncle this is like 5KM-5KM-5KM = 1/3 marathon distance challenge... this one will be equivalent to the Mega Streaker (if there should be one)...90min x 3...or 15KM x 3   SCSM 2020 Virtual Club is indeed...a Training Based Platform gearing up for VR Race or Real Run...with your favourite running/cycling/rowing/swimming/treadmill...apps yes, uncle can now really be "verified"...20+20+18KM or 58KM/week...is indeed acheivable...from SCSM Platform...without paying... for many reasons, uncle has no need for ST Virtual Run for 175KM...it can be done and "verified" with SCSM Platform in the next 2 weeks if uncle faithfully looking forward to Weekly (6-15) VR Race/Challenge Sessions... 😀 are you ready for 2020 SCSM (Grand Finale)? uncle thinks, you must get used to the format to know what is the Grand Finale Race or Challenge...because if this is a World Athletics event...Gold Label Road Race...certainly, it is worth the challenge to participate...right? just leave a motivating thought for all...“It’s definitely been a change in lifestyle and a change of mindset (during Covid-19 pandemic). And to keep yourself not only healthy in body but also healthy in mind, you need to get outside.” lastly, on the Alternative VR... walk, run, cycle...33KM...and being a cyclist on training....better for cycling...of course, uncle does both...so shall skip, since, someone can simply drive 5 loops...wait 8 hours...and register/verify as "walk" also can...pacing can be "averaged" out over time.... yes, Virtual Race is fun, Virtual Race is Healthy for most, especially newbies...but, if it can be "manipulated" just for "casual competitive" reason make it "qualifier" in the Leaderboard....tsk tsk tsk...how then to prevent "unethical" tactics of really do the running? even with "designated" routes...are you sure?  of course, there in never DNF element in Virtual Race, and the only judgement of your performance is how you decide to want in your submission of set of "results" via GPA log... food for thoughts...Virtual Race...register to buy merchandise of what you want to achieve...with no DNF consideration (because you can attempt again - like SCSM virtial challenge)...unlike in REAL RUN race...official timing plus Race Marshall's Decision determine your 1-time session only... choose your next VR Race with better conviction and determination...not another merchandise show piece like 1000 miles to Nowhere, complete in 3 months...if uncle can fly...complete the VR race also can..zzzZZZ...Sleep Can Wait...😀    
    • Not sure about SCSM platform, but I upload my running records in spacebib exactly like what sicklycat described. Very clear cut. I believe The Star Wars VR has lesser participants compared to ST, being more expensive and just a medal as entitlement.
    • I honestly cannot relate why an athlete need to slow down for other competitors in a race when their competitors encounter unfortunate scenarios such as taking a wrong turn. I understand that some athletes have this mindset that they must compete under the fairest conditions as possible, so that their win is more "honorable". Or maybe some athletes are just more compassionate than others. But there are so many uncontrollable factors and unforeseen circumstances in a race that it is simply impossible for a run to be 100% fair to all the athletes. In a race, all the runner should just need to focus on is to give their best, and any deviations from that is a letdown to their training/ trainers, and their time and hardship that they have put in to prepare for the run.
×
×
  • Create New...